Upselling with Integrity: connecting authentically with your target market
Guest articles >
Upselling with Integrity: connecting authentically with your target market
by: Sharon Drew Morgen
I recently took a cold call from Comcast - the first cold call Iâ€™ve ever
taken. With my two year contract just about up, I was interested in finding
cheap deals moving forward. Here was the call:
Comcast: Hi Sharon. Iâ€™m Pete from Comcast, wanting to help you
sort through your options with your TV programming since your current package
expires in December.
SDM: Pete, my first name is Sharon Drew, never Sharon. Always
both names, ok? Thanks. I was going to call you anyway. My free HBO and Showtime
are expiring. Can you tell me how much will it cost me once they go up? Is there
a different 2 year plan I can sign up for that would keep my rate about the
Comcast: Well, Sharon, Iâ€¦
SDM: Excuse me, Pete. Sharon Drew. My first name is Sharon
Comcast: Um, ok. Well. Iâ€™m glad you asked. Given what youâ€™ve
got now, I think I can actually upgrade your programs and still save you money.
We have a package that does X. It will give you XYZ, similar to what you have
now with two added channels, but costs less.
SDM: Whatâ€™s the downside? What do I gain? Lose?
Comcast: Everything is exactly the same, except youâ€™ll get two
more channels and pay less.
SDM: Exactly the same? Cheaper? More programs? Cool.
Comcast: Yup. Exactly the same and cheaper. I can send you the
paperwork, and you can see for yourself.
He then texted me a link to a contract to pay; within the
contract was another link to details. I clicked and noticed inconsistencies.
SDM: This is more expensive! Youâ€™ve unbundled each feature and
charged separately, so Iâ€™d pay $45 more than if I just let my current deal
expire in December.
Comcast: Everyone pays for those things. You couldnâ€™t have
Comcast if we didnâ€™t offer those features.
SDM: Thatâ€™s not what I said; and youâ€™re making the argument
murky. You said it would be the same and cheaper with two new channels. But itâ€™s
not cheaper; services are unbundled and charged out individually on top of the
quoted rate, causing me to pay more than I would with my next contract. Sounds
like youâ€™re lying to me or at least trying to muddle the facts so it just
appears that Iâ€™d be saving money. What am I missing?
Comcast: Silence. Silence. Click.
As my provider, as the company/behemoth to whom I give thousands of dollars
annually, Comcast owes me honesty, no? And arenâ€™t they big enough to not try to
dupe customers who would have pressed â€˜Payâ€™ without reading the â€˜fine print?â€™
Surely lying canâ€™t be the preferred avenue to successful upselling, although Iâ€™m
sure sometimes sales folks â€˜do whatever it takesâ€™ to get the commission without
the sanction of their supervisors. In this case I actually redialed Comcast and
said I wanted to renew my plan. When the seller looked up my account, she did
exactly what the first guy did â€“ same promise, same spiel, same text/link. Sadly
it seems Comcast is training their reps this way.
WHY BUYERS BUY UPSELLS
As vendors, our job is to serve our clients and customers; our products are
the path to serving, so weâ€™re a â€˜customer service company that provides web
design services,â€™ or a â€˜customer service company that provides financial
services.â€™ As such, answering questions and solving problems are part of the
promise implicit in a purchase. [PERSONAL NOTE: Any time we betray our clientsâ€™
trust and donâ€™t deliver on the promise inherent in their purchase, and any time
we lie to our customers, they have the right to choose another provider who will
One of our services is letting customers know when we develop an upgrade; our
success at upselling depends on how we connect to inform them.
Who is a suitable buyer? There are two inbuilt problems:
- The only customers who will buy an upgrade are happy customers who
already trust us and have taken us into their daily lives and habits.
[Customers who donâ€™t like our solution or donâ€™t trust us will never buy
again and arenâ€™t prospects for upselling. Remember that, when designing
customer support programs like help desks and call centers.]
- In the homes and offices of happy customers, our solution/service has
become habituated; clients have developed a system of people, policies,
behaviors, or habits that are in place when using the product and theyâ€™re
doing very well, thanks. The problem is not in convincing them to buy a
bigger/better add-on because itâ€™s, well, bigger/better, but to help them
figure out how to manage whatever change and disruption the upgrade would
require. For example, if users are happily using the software they bought
from you, theyâ€™d need to... to what? Take additional training and incur
downtime? Face disruption that would carry a cost? Maybe buying newer
services could cause more downside than upside. By merely focusing on
features and functions, the real problem is overlooked: the focus of their
objection is change.
The fact that they will be â€˜betterâ€™ with an upgrade is most likely accurate,
but beside the point. We each â€˜knowâ€™ weâ€™d be better if we stopped smoking/lost
weight/jogged/meditated/were kinder, etc. But knowing isnâ€™t the point. The
problem is the change â€“ the time, disruption, confusion, political or
relationship risks, etc. - involved in altering an established pattern. (Note:
Iâ€™ve coded the steps to congruent change to help you understand what buyers must
do before they can buy.)
When we introduce and describe our new solutions, when we focus on
introducing and pitching the value of our solution, we ignore the biggest factor
that inhibits buying: as outsiders we canâ€™t know how the purchase would affect
the buyerâ€™s environment and use routines - the relationships, politics, time
factors, etc. - which may change, or might be perceived to change, with an
upgrade. Before they buy, they must understand the extent of any disruption to
determine if itâ€™s worth it to them: a trouble-free working environment and
nominal cost supersedes need. Remember: they find the current version
â€˜good-enoughâ€™ as it is; they have people and policies in place and have factored
in the costs and resource. Habit and status quo may supersede benefits.
Iâ€™ve got a story. IBM was seeking local users of an old OS to place a new
Beta test version, with a goal of visiting, testing, questioning, etc. There was
a possible user right down the road and IBM was eager to enlist them. But three
different sales reps tried to engage this user to no avail. Nope, weâ€™re happy.
Yes, our current OS is very slow and we understand this new, free, one would
make our jobs easier and workflow faster. Nope. We donâ€™t want the beta.
Since I was already there running a Buying FacilitationÂ® training they asked
me to try. The phone call follows:
SDM: My name is Sharon Drew Morgen and Iâ€™m calling from IBM. Is
this a good time to speak?
CUSTOMER: Sure. How can I help you? [Note: I was fascinated
that just about everyone took a cold call from IBM.]
SDM: I am following up from my colleagueâ€™s call re giving you a
free beta OS, and I heard that youâ€™re really happy using the OS youâ€™ve got in
place now. Seems itâ€™s working really well for you and you donâ€™t seem to mind its
CUSTOMER: It is slow. But we like it.
SDM: Whatâ€™s stopping you from considering adding more speed to
the one youâ€™re using now?
SDM: Excuse me? Dad? What does that mean?
CUSTOMER: Weâ€™re a Mom and Pop shop. My dad is the Pop. Heâ€™s 75,
and will be retiring next year. Heâ€™s in charge of the technology, and heâ€™s not
as sharp as he once was. Weâ€™re not going to add anything to his plate, and wait
til he retires to upgrade whatever we need to.
SDM: Ah. That makes sense. I wonder how hard our new OS is to
learn or use. I could find out. What would you and Dad need to know to be
willing to experience whether or not the new OS would be simple enough, just in
case there came a time when you wanted to accommodate all your new users?
CUSTOMER: Iâ€™d need to know that Dad would have no difficulty or
confusion, and it would be easy and seamless to implement with no glitches.
SDM: We happen to have a functioning beta site for this product
right down the street from you. Would you and Dad be willing to join me and
visit them to try it out? Then, if Dad likes it and you find it more efficient,
we could then discuss you being a possible beta site for us?
It all went well, IBM got a new Beta test site and the customer got a free
upgrade. Itâ€™s not about an upgrade; itâ€™s about their readiness for change. And
as outsiders, we can never know where a â€˜Dadâ€™ is and have no opportunity to lead
them through a different decision.
Convincer and information strategies close the low hanging fruit. Each
customer has unique â€˜givensâ€™ that have created and maintained their status quo;
theyâ€™re not â€˜stupid buyersâ€™, they just must manage their own internal integrity.
And the conventional sales approach assumes that the features, functions, and
benefits will convince them to buy, ignoring the â€˜howâ€™ or â€˜ifâ€™ or â€˜whyâ€™ or
â€˜whenâ€™ to handle any disruption caused to their system by adding a new element
to their status quo.
- The target audience consists only of those who are happy using the
solution they purchased (and that those who donâ€™t would most likely never
buy anything more);
- Conventional sales merely closes the low hanging fruit - those ready,
willing, and able to manage any change inherent in an upgrade. Do blanket
outreach with questionnaires, surveys, contests, prizes, to find these ready
buyers, or find creative ways to target them specifically.
- Itâ€™s possible to facilitate buyers through their change process, as in
the Dad story above, and broaden the buyer base.
What is the suitable vehicle? There are certainly several ways to facilitate
upselling with integrity. When customers call in, ensure an integrous connection
with someone or something in your company; provide a wonderful opportunity to
exhibit respect and care. Each vehicle requires a different approach but
includes the goal of facilitating change and managing the change-over to new
Cold Calling with Integrity: Happy customers have more of a
willingness to take a call. Use this as an opportunity to serve them by
facilitating change. I designed Buying FacilitationÂ® to specifically facilitate
the buyerâ€™s steps of change and decision making; or design your own unique
Change Facilitation model that quickly helps them think through routes to
managing any disruption, and adds product pitch once the customer is ready.
Remember: unless a prospect can positively address their change, use, and
habituation issues, they will not buy regardless of need or the strength of your
Email outreach: Current email blasts focus on introducing reasons to
buy the upgrade. Itâ€™s possible to add â€˜implementation featuresâ€™ or â€˜ways to get
your cell phone recycledâ€™, or ideas to mitigate whatever change your particular
solution might incur. For this I recommend you research the routines and issues
current customers face when using your solution. When researching this for my
clients, I call several existing happy customers and ask the â€˜howâ€™ of their
routines, and I include the Facilitative Question: What would keep you from
adding an upgrade to what youâ€™re currently doing successfully?
Help desk: Currently, help desks suck. With a focus on time rather
than service, we get customers enraged and frustrated. This is a wasted
opportunity. When working with Quest years ago, we taught the reps to help
customers figure out how and if an upgrade would serve them; we brought the help
desk upgrade rate from $300 a month to $2100 a month per rep.
Tech support: See above: this is a great opportunity to serve. Youâ€™re
wasting it by keeping people on hold and passing customers from pillar to post.
Have ONE person own the incident to minimize the annoyance factor and use a
Change Facilitation approach while on the phone. A great venue for upselling.
On-line chat: Reprogram responses to avoid the disrespect and
annoyance that keeps customers from using this feature. Again, it can be a great
opportunity for upselling if used correctly.
These are merely an introduction to ideas for more robust upselling. Itâ€™s
possible to upsell a lot more than youâ€™re now selling. Good luck.
Sharon Drew Morgen is the visionary behind Buying FacilitationÂ® - a change
management model that includes learning how to Listen for Systems, formulating
Facilitative Questions, and understanding the steps of systemic change. For
those of you wishing to learn more, take a look at the program syllabus. Please
visit www.dirtylittlesecrets.com and read the two free chapters. Consider
reading it with the companion ebook Buying FacilitationÂ®
Sharon Drew is the author of the NYTimes Business Bestseller Selling With
Integrity, as well as 6 other books on helping buyers buy. She is also the
author of the Amazon bestseller What? Did you really say what I think I heard?
Sharon Drew keynotes, trains and coaches sales teams to help them unlock
situations that are stalled, and teaches teams how to present and prospect by
facilitating the complete buying decision process. She delivers keynotes at
annual sales conferences globally. Sharon Drew can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org
512 771 1117
Contributor: Sharon Drew Morgen
Published here on: 17-Dec-17