|
|||||||
|
|
Arousal principlePrinciples > Arousal principle Principle | How it works | So what?
PrincipleWhen I am aroused I am full engaged and hence more likely to pay attention. When my emotions are stimulated, my ability to make rational decisions is reduced, making me easier to influence. How it worksArousal occurs when the mind spots something that is important, often as a threat to basic needs although it can also be something that could help us achieve our goals. Physiology of arousalArousal is a physical state which can range from a gentle increase in interest to full-on fight-or-flight reaction, where the whole biology of the body is changed. Think of a time when you were aroused by something. You probably experienced bodily sensations of some kind. There may have been a powerful tingling shooting up your spine. Your might have had a hot flush rushing up you neck and around your face. You toes or fingers may have twitched. Emotional arousalWhen needs or goals are affected, either by threat or opportunity, we become emotionally engaged. When emotionally aroused, our rationality reduces, making us more likely to make rash decisions. Hence emotionally aroused people are more open to carefully-placed persuasive methods. Ready for actionWhen a person is aroused, their whole body is poised for action and they are very easy to tip into doing things, possibly with relatively little thought about the consequences. Think about the motivating speeches of leaders. Consider the threats of competitors. Remember when you were last in an auction. When you were aroused, you were ready to act at a moment's notice. So what?If you want somebody to act quickly, wind them up with direct or indirect threats or other immediate things that lead to them to a heightened state of arousal. Beware in doing this that you do not wind them up so much they go in the opposite direction. To manage your own arousal and those you seek to help, consider building aspects of Emotional Intelligence. See alsoTheories about conforming, Theories about being contrary Fisher and Ury (1981) describe interests vs. positions in negotiation. |
|
|
|
|
|||||